Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15908571›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2005

Gating mechanisms of the type-1 inositol trisphosphate receptor.

Irina Baran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Irina BaranBiophysics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania. baran@theor1.theory.nipne.ro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large amount of data and observations on inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) binding to the IP(3) receptor/Ca(2+) channel, the steady-state activity of the channel, and its inactivation by IP(3) can be explained by assuming one activation and one inhibition module, both allosterically operated by Ca(2+), IP(3), and ATP, and one adaptation element, driven by IP(3), Ca(2+), and the interconversion between two possible conformations of the receptor. The adaptation module becomes completely insensitive to a second IP(3) pulse within 80 s. Observed kinetic responses are well reproduced if, in addition, two module open states are rendered inactive by the current charge carrier Mn(2+). The inactivation time constants are 59 s in the activation, and 0.75 s in the adaptation module. The in vivo open probability of the channel is predicted to be almost in coincidence with the behavior in lipid bilayers for IP(3) levels of 0.2 and 2 microM and one-order-higher at 0.02 microM IP(3), whereas at 180 microM IP(3) the maximal in vivo activity may be 2.5-orders higher than in bilayers and restricted to a narrower Ca(2+) domain (approximately 10 microM-wide versus approximately 100 microM-wide). IP(3) is likely to inhibit channel activity at < or =120 nM Ca(2+) in vivo.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularBinding SitesCalciumCalcium ChannelsComputer SimulationInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsLipid BilayersModels, StatisticalMotionPorosityProtein BindingProtein ConformationReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearStructure-Activity RelationshipCalciumCalcium ChannelsInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsLipid BilayersReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID15908571
PMCPMC1366646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.