Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15908389›Full record

Trial reportInfection and immunity2005

Human immune response to a plague vaccine comprising recombinant F1 and V antigens.

E D Williamson, H C Flick-Smith, C Lebutt, C A Rowland, S M Jones, E L Waters, R J Gwyther, J Miller, P J Packer, M Irving

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Infection and immunity, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Polymorphism in theFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E D WilliamsonDstl Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom. dwilliamson@dstl.gov.uk
H C Flick-Smith
C Lebutt
C A Rowland
S M Jones
E L Waters
R J Gwyther
J Miller
P J Packer
M Irving
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human immune response to a new recombinant plague vaccine, comprising recombinant F1 (rF1) and rV antigens, has been assessed during a phase 1 safety and immunogenicity trial in healthy volunteers. All the subjects produced specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) in serum after the priming dose, which peaked in value after the booster dose (day 21), with the exception of one individual in the lowest dose level group, who responded to rF1 only. Three subjects, found to have an anti-rV titer at screening, were excluded from the overall analysis. Human antibody functionality has been assessed by quantification of antibody competing for binding to rV in vitro and also by the transfer of protective immunity in human serum into the naive mouse. Human and macaque IgG competed for binding to rV in vitro with a mouse monoclonal antibody, previously shown to protect mice against challenge with plague, suggesting that this protective B-cell epitope on rV is conserved between these three species. Total IgG to rV in individuals and the titer of IgG competing for binding to rV correlated significantly at days 21 (r = 0.72; P < 0.001) and 28 (r = 0.82; P < 0.001). Passive transfer of protective immunity into mice also correlated significantly with total IgG titer to rF1 plus rV at days 21 (r(2) = 98.6%; P < 0.001) and 28 (r(2) = 76.8%; P < 0.03). However, no significant vaccination-related change in activation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was detected at any time. Potential serological immune correlates of protection have been investigated, but no trends specific to vaccination could be detected in cellular markers.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsDouble-Blind MethodEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryHumansImmunoglobulin GLeukocyte CountMalePlague VaccinePore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial Proteinscaf1 protein, Yersinia pestisImmunoglobulin GLcrV protein, YersiniaPlague VaccinePore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID15908389
PMCPMC1111881
OpenAlexW2154891001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.