Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15907701›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2005

Denaturation of lysozyme and myoglobin in laser spray.

Atsushi Takamizawa, Susumu Fujimaki, Jan Sunner, Kenzo Hiraoka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Atsushi TakamizawaClean Energy Research Center, University of Yamanashi, Takeda 4-3-11, Kofu 400-8511, Japan.
Susumu Fujimaki
Jan Sunner
Kenzo Hiraoka

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In laser spray, the tip of an electrospray capillary is irradiated with a continuous CO(2) laser beam. Here, we report results from a modified laser spray method that employs a relatively low laser irradiance level. With a laser power of approximately 2 W and a focal spot size ( approximately 0.3 mm), which covered the entire front surface of the electrospray capillary, the irradiance was approximately 3 x 10(3) W/cm(2). This resulted in a quiescent and smooth vaporization of aqueous solutions. This "evaporation-mode" laser spray method yielded the best results so far obtained in our laboratory with laser-irradiated electrospray, producing higher and more stable signals. The method was applied to the analysis of aqueous solutions of lysozyme and myoglobin. Mass spectra were obtained as a function of laser power from 0 W (electrospray) to approximately 2 W. The spray generated at the tip of the stainless steel capillary was observed with a CCD camera. With increase of laser power, the droplets in the spray became finer and the Taylor cone became progressively smaller. The strongest ion signals were recorded when the sample solution protruded only slightly from the tip of the capillary. A broadening of the lysozyme charge-state distribution, attributable to protein unfolding, was observed with a laser power of 2 W. No denaturation of myoglobin took place up to a laser power of 1.6 W. However, a sudden onset of denaturation was observed at 1.8 W as a broadening of the myoglobin charge distribution and the appearance of apo-myoglobin peaks. These findings demonstrate that laser spray is capable of dissociating the noncovalent complexes selectively without breaking covalent bonds.

Indexed as

LasersAnimalsChickensEgg ProteinsHorsesModels, ChemicalMuramidaseMyoglobinProtein DenaturationSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationEgg ProteinsMuramidaseMyoglobin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.