ReviewDrugs2005
Angiotensin antagonism in coronary artery disease: results after coronary revascularisation.
Review in Drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atherosclerosis Progression in Native Coronaries After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2026Review
- In-stent restenosis is associated with proliferative skin healing and specific immune and endothelial cell profiles: results from the RACHEL trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- AGTR1rs5186 Polymorphism Is Associated with the Risk of Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- The effects of stenting on coronary endothelium from a molecular biological view: Time for improvement?Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019Review
- Association of seven renin angiotensin system gene polymorphisms with restenosis in patients following coronary stenting.Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is an ancient and complex cascade of homeostatic reactions aimed at regulating primordial functions that ensure organ perfusion through the control of blood pressure and the regulation of renal-cardiac activity. However, the over-expression or lack of compensatory mechanisms of any of its components may initiate detrimental effects that potentially lead to disease, a balance that makes the RAS a sequence with a labile physiological equilibrium and with a strong harm potential. These characteristics of the RAS in general, and of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) in particular, make it not only an important complex for the regulation of blood pressure and neuropeptide metabolism, but also a fascinating subject of study from a biochemical, evolutionary and genetic point of view. Pharmacological interventions that influence the RAS by inhibiting the ACE or the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) have demonstrated sustained efficacy in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events and, consequently, vascular mortality in several clinical situations. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARAs) reduce blood pressure and have cardio- and vasculoprotective effects. Anti-atherosclerotic effects have also been attributed to these drugs. For these reasons, it has been hypothesised that RAS inhibitors could also reduce the recurrence of ischaemic events after myocardial revascularisation procedures, namely coronary artery by-pass graft surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Information available on the effect of ACE inhibitors and ARAs in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) previously treated with revascularisation techniques indicates a substantial reduction of mortality and infarction in these patients. However, data regarding the progression of CAD, restenosis or reocclusion of vascular conduits of the coronary circulation after myocardial revascularisation are inconsistent. In most studies, the administration of ACE inhibitors neither improved the ischaemic threshold nor reduced the need for new revascularisation procedures. On the contrary, ACE inhibitors have been associated with higher restenosis rates after PCI in some retrospective series. Conversely, a single, exploratory randomised trial demonstrated that the selective AT1R antagonist valsartan significantly reduced stent restenosis after PCI. In patients undergoing CABG, ACE inhibitors did not reduce the risk of graft degeneration or occlusion. Studies that evaluated a possible anti-atherosclerotic effect of ACE inhibitors (including some large randomised trials) have generally been negative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.