Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15906464›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2005

MHC odours are not required or sufficient for recognition of individual scent owners.

Jane L Hurst, Michael D Thom, Charlotte M Nevison, Richard E Humphries, Robert J Beynon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. MHC signaling during social communication.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2012
    Article
  10. Mouse models of autism: testing hypotheses about molecular mechanisms.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Scent marking behavior as an odorant communication in mice.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2008
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Self-referent MHC type matching in frog tadpoles.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2008
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jane L HurstAnimal Behavior Group, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK. jane.hurst@liv.ac.uk
Michael D Thom
Charlotte M Nevison
Richard E Humphries
Robert J Beynon

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council S19816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To provide information about specific depositors, scent marks need to encode a stable signal of individual ownership. The highly polymorphic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) influences scents and contributes to the recognition of close kin and avoidance of inbreeding when MHC haplotypes are shared. MHC diversity between individuals has also been proposed as a primary source of scents used in individual recognition. We tested this in the context of scent owner recognition among male mice, which scent mark their territories and countermark scents from other males. We examined responses towards urine scent according to the scent owner's genetic difference to the territory owner (MHC, genetic background, both and neither) or genetic match to a familiar neighbour. While urine of a different genetic background from the subject always stimulated greater scent marking than own, regardless of familiarity, MHC-associated odours were neither necessary nor sufficient for scent owner recognition and failed to stimulate countermarking. Urine of a different MHC type to the subject stimulated increased investigation only when this matched both the MHC and genetic background of a familiar neighbour. We propose an associative model of scent owner recognition in which volatile scent profiles, contributed by both fixed genetic and varying non-genetic factors, are learnt in association with a stable involatile ownership signal provided by other highly polymorphic urine components.

Indexed as

OdorantsTerritorialityAnimalsAssociation LearningHaplotypesMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CRecognition, PsychologySmellUrine

Identifiers

PMID15906464
PMCPMC1602052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.