Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15905896›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2005

Reproducibility of postexercise ambulatory blood pressure in Stage I hypertension.

L A A Lehmkuhl, S Park, D Zakutansky, C A Jastremski, J P Wallace

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Exercise and hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L A A LehmkuhlForschungsbereich Sport- und Bewegungsmedizin, Fachbereich Sportwissenschaft, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
S Park
D Zakutansky
C A Jastremski
J P Wallace

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accuracy and reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring used in intervention and treatment studies is essential to assure the desired health outcomes. The reproducibility of ambulatory variables in pharmacological studies has been reported, however, the reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure variables associated with exercise has not been reported. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of the postexercise ambulatory blood pressure in Stage I hypertensive adults. It was hypothesized that the reproducibility of the ambulatory blood pressure variables would not be different following two corresponding exercise and control treatments. A total of 18 Stage I hypertensive adults (142.1+/-3.15/91.6+/-1.80 mmHg) performed four randomized, 24 h AmBP monitoring sessions: two following a 50 min treadmill walk (50% VO(2) peak) and two on control days. Variables measured were: (1) average systolic and diastolic pressures for 24 h, daytime (06:00-22:00 h) and night time (22:00-06:00 h) and (2) systolic and diastolic load for the same time periods. Both a nonsignificant paired t-test and an excellent intraclass correlation were used to define reproducibility of the variables between the 1st and 2nd exercise trials and between the 1st and 2nd control trials. Reproducibility was found for all the control variables except for nighttime diastolic load. Reproducibility was found for all the systolic and diastolic exercise variables. Ambulatory blood pressure measurements, including average systolic and diastolic blood pressures and systolic and diastolic loads for 24 h, daytime and night time periods are reproducible following exercise.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryAdultCircadian RhythmExerciseExercise TestFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID15905896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.