Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15905479›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

The effect of computerized provider order entry on medical student clerkship experiences.

Amy M Knight, Steven J Kravet, G Michael Harper, Bruce Leff

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Enter and Discuss Orders and Prescriptions (EPA 4): A Curriculum for Fourth-Year Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Electronic Health Record Skills Workshop for Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy M KnightCIMS Division, ASC Building, Room 262, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. aknight@jhmi.edu
Steven J Kravet
G Michael Harper
Bruce Leff

Funding

ZINC THERAPY FOR SCLERODERMA--PHASE I STUDYM01RR002719 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EARLEY, CHRISTOPHER J · 1986 to 2007
$20.2M
NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR-02719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe medical students' attitudes toward placing orders during training, and the effect of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) on their learning experiences.

designProspective, controlled study of all 143 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine students who began the Basic Medicine clerkship between March 2003 and April 2004 at one of three teaching hospitals: one using CPOE, one paper orders, and one that began using CPOE midway through this study. MEASUREMENTS: Survey of students at the start and after the first month of the clerkship.

resultsNinety-six percent of students responded. Students expressed a desire to place 100% of orders for their patients. Ninety-five percent of students believed that placing orders helps students learn what tests and treatments patients need. Eighty-four percent reported that being unavailable due to conferences and teaching sessions was a significant barrier to participating in the ordering process. Students at hospitals using CPOE reported placing significantly fewer of their patients' follow-up orders compared to students at hospitals using paper orders (25% vs. 50%, p < 0.01) and were more likely to report that their resident or intern did not want them to enter orders (40% vs. 16%, p < 0.01). Comparisons of students at hospitals using CPOE to each other showed that these differences were attributable to one of the hospitals. Thirty-two percent of students at both hospitals using CPOE reported that the extra length of time required for housestaff to review their orders in the computer was a significant barrier.

conclusionHospitals need to ensure that the educational potential of medical students' clinical experiences is maximized when implementing CPOE.

Indexed as

Attitude to ComputersClinical ClerkshipMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedUser-Computer InterfaceData CollectionHospital Information SystemsHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID15905479
PMCPMC1205604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.