Participants in research.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Who can you trust? A review of free online sources of "trustworthy" information about treatment effects for patients and the public.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019
   Pooled it
2. Research as an essentiality beyond one's own competence: an interview study on frail older people's view of research.Research involvement and engagement · 2021
   Article
3. Was it worth it? Older adults' experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study - a focus group study.BMC geriatrics · 2019
   Article
4. Understanding of research: a Sri Lankan perspective.BMC medical ethics · 2010
   Article
5. 'Not taken in by media hype': how potential donors, recipients and members of the general public perceive stem cell research.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2009
   Article
6. Participants in research: routine extrapolation of randomised controlled trials is absurd.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
   Article
7. Participants in research: patients in clinical trials are protected by consumer regulation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
   Article
8. Participants in research: contract to run a trial should include patient-researchers in steering groups.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Participants in research: routine extrapolation of randomised controlled trials is absurd.2005
• Commented on by
  Participants in research: contract to run a trial should include patient-researchers in steering groups.2005
• Commented on by
  Participants in research: patients in clinical trials are protected by consumer regulation.2005
• Comment on
  Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome.2005

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as