Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15904559›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

Self-help books for depression: how can practitioners and patients make the right choice?

Liz Anderson, Glyn Lewis, Ricardo Araya, Rodney Elgie, Glynn Harrison, Judy Proudfoot, Ulrike Schmidt, Deborah Sharp, Alison Weightman, Chris Williams

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05351645 (Digital Narrative Bibliotherapy as a Scalable Intervention for Suicidal Thoughts), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05351645 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Digital Narrative Bibliotherapy as a Scalable Intervention for Suicidal Thoughts: A Randomized Controlled Trial (Testing Whether Selected Blog Posts Can Improve Well-being)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarvard UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled864ConditionsSuicidal IdeationArmsTreatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Brief interventions for depression in primary care: a systematic review.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2009
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liz AndersonAcademic Unit of Psychiatry, University of Bristol. E.J.Anderson@bristol.ac.uk
Glyn Lewis
Ricardo Araya
Rodney Elgie
Glynn Harrison
Judy Proudfoot
Ulrike Schmidt
Deborah Sharp
Alison Weightman
Chris Williams
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is a common and important public health problem most often treated by GPs. A self-help approach is popular with patients, yet little is known about its effectiveness.

aimOur primary aim was to review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of bibliotherapy in the treatment of depression. Our secondary aim was to identify which of these self-help materials are generally available to buy and to examine the evidence specific to these publications.

methodMedline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CCTR, PsiTri and the National Research Register were searched for randomised trials that evaluated self-help books for depression which included participants aged over 16 years with a diagnosis or symptoms of depression. Clinical symptoms, quality of life, costs or acceptability to users were the required outcome measures. Papers were obtained and data extracted independently by two researchers. A meta-analysis using a random effects model was carried out using the mean score and standard deviation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at the endpoint of the trial.

resultsEleven randomised controlled trials were identified. None fulfilled CONSORT guidelines and all were small, with the largest trial having 40 patients per group. Nine of these evaluated two current publications, Managing Anxiety and Depression (UK) and Feeling Good (US). A meta-analysis of 6 trials evaluating Feeling Good found a large treatment effect compared to delayed treatment (standardised mean difference = -1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.76 to -0.96). Five self-help books were identified as being available and commonly bought by members of the public in addition to the two books that had been evaluated in trials.

conclusionThere are a number of self-help books for the treatment of depression readily available. For the majority, there is little direct evidence for their effectiveness. There is weak evidence that suggests that bibliotherapy, based on a cognitive behavioural therapy approach is useful for some people when they are given some additional guidance. More work is required in primary care to investigate the cost-effectiveness of self-help and the most suitable format and presentation of materials.

Indexed as

BooksAdolescentAdultAgedChoice BehaviorCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressive DisorderHumansMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPatientsProfessional PracticeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf CareTeaching Materials

Identifiers

PMID15904559
PMCPMC1463163
OpenAlexW2171092731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.