Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15902287›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2005

What have we learnt from mouse models of NPM-ALK-induced lymphomagenesis?

S D Turner, D R Alexander

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. ALK-immunoreactive neoplasms.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Determining the contribution of NPM1 heterozygosity to NPM-ALK-induced lymphomagenesis.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S D TurnerLaboratory of Lymphocyte Signalling and Development, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK. Suzanne.Turner@bbsrc.ac.uk
D R Alexander
Babraham Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleophosmin-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (NPM-ALK) is generated as a t(2;5) chromosomal breakpoint product, typically in CD30(+) anaplastic large cell lymphomas. Activation of the NPM-ALK tyrosine kinase by NPM dimerisation causes autophosphorylation at multiple tyrosine residues and the consequent recruitment of a 'signalosome' that couples the fusion protein to pathways regulating mitogenesis and apoptosis. This review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the transforming signals induced by this fusion protein in mouse models.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansLymphomaMiceMice, TransgenicOncogene Proteins, FusionPhosphorylationProtein-Tyrosine KinasesSignal TransductionOncogene Proteins, Fusionp80(NPM-ALK) proteinProtein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID15902287
OpenAlexW2153678586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.