Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15902276›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2005

Protein toxins: intracellular trafficking for targeted therapy.

L Johannes, D Decaudin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Intracellular delivery system for antibody-Peptide drug conjugates.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L JohannesLaboratoire Trafic et Signalisation, UMR144 Curie/CNRS, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, F-75248 Paris Cedex 05, France.
D Decaudin
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Curie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immunotoxin approach is based on the use of tumor-targeting ligands or antibodies that are linked to the catalytic (toxic) moieties of bacterial or plant protein toxins. In this review, we first discuss the current state of clinical development of immunotoxin approaches describing the results obtained with the two toxins most frequently used: diphtheria and Pseudomonas toxin-derived proteins. In the second part of the review, a novel concept will be presented in which the roles are inverted: nontoxic receptor-binding toxin moieties are used for the targeting of therapeutic and diagnostic compounds to cancer or immune cells. The cell biological basis of these novel types of toxin-based therapeutics will be discussed, and we will summarize ongoing preclinical and clinical testing.

Indexed as

CytoplasmDendritic CellsGenetic TherapyHumansImmunotherapyImmunotoxinsNeoplasmsProtein SubunitsProtein TransportShiga Toxin 2T-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicImmunotoxinsProtein SubunitsShiga Toxin 2shiga toxin 2 B subunit

Identifiers

PMID15902276
OpenAlexW2081971022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.