Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15901699›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2005

Fructose utilization in Lactococcus lactis as a model for low-GC gram-positive bacteria: its regulator, signal, and DNA-binding site.

Charlotte Barrière, Maria Veiga-da-Cunha, Nicolas Pons, Eric Guédon, Sacha A F T van Hijum, Jan Kok, Oscar P Kuipers, Dusko S Ehrlich, Pierre Renault

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biological Function of Prophage-Related Gene Cluster ΔInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gene targets for engineering osmotolerance inBiotechnology for biofuels · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Further Elucidation of Galactose Utilization inFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Coordinated Regulation of the EIIApplied and environmental microbiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Early Transcriptome Response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Charlotte BarrièreGénétique Microbienne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France.
Maria Veiga-da-Cunha
Nicolas Pons
Eric Guédon
Sacha A F T van Hijum
Jan Kok
Oscar P Kuipers
Dusko S Ehrlich
Pierre Renault
Département Génétique Animale · FRUniversity of Groningen · NLde Duve Institute · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to its role as carbon and energy source, fructose metabolism was reported to affect other cellular processes, such as biofilm formation by streptococci and bacterial pathogenicity in plants. Fructose genes encoding a 1-phosphofructokinase and a phosphotransferase system (PTS) fructose-specific enzyme IIABC component reside commonly in a gene cluster with a DeoR family regulator in various gram-positive bacteria. We present a comprehensive study of fructose metabolism in Lactococcus lactis, including a systematic study of fru mutants, global messenger analysis, and a molecular characterization of its regulation. The fru operon is regulated at the transcriptional level by both FruR and CcpA and at the metabolic level by inducer exclusion. The FruR effector is fructose-1-phosphate (F1P), as shown by combined analysis of transcription and measurements of the intracellular F1P pools in mutants either unable to produce this metabolite or accumulating it. The regulation of the fru operon by FruR requires four adjacent 10-bp direct repeats. The well-conserved organization of the fru promoter region in various low-GC gram-positive bacteria, including CRE boxes as well as the newly defined FruR motif, suggests that the regulation scheme defined in L. lactis could be applied to these bacteria. Transcriptome profiling of fruR and fruC mutants revealed that the effect of F1P and FruR regulation is limited to the fru operon in L. lactis. This result is enforced by the fact that no other targets for FruR were found in the available low-GC gram-positive bacteria genomes, suggesting that additional phenotypical effects due to fructose metabolism do not rely directly on FruR control, but rather on metabolism.

Indexed as

GenomicsAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsFructoseFructosephosphatesGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGram-Positive BacteriaLactococcus lactisMolecular Sequence DataOperonRepressor ProteinsSignal TransductionBacterial Proteinscatabolite control proteins, bacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsFructosefructose-1-phosphateFructosephosphatesRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15901699
PMCPMC1112048
OpenAlexW2130588153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.