ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2005
Validity of analysis of FMRP expression in blood smears as a screening test for Fragile X Syndrome in the Indian population.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular diagnosis of Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is carried out by PCR or Southern blot analysis on DNA isolated from leukocytes. These DNA analyses are time consuming and expensive, making it impractical for mass screening programs. We have recently standardized and tested the diagnostic potential of a rapid antibody test on blood smears, based on the presence of FMRP, the protein product of the FMR1 gene, in lymphocytes from normal individuals and the absence of FMRP in lymphocytes in patients with FXS. This test is essentially similar to the one developed at Erasmus University in the Netherlands, with suitable modifications. The diagnostic power of the antibody test is perfect for males, whereas the results are less specific for females. The cutoff value for affected male individuals, expressed as the percentage of FMRP-positive cells, was 20%. In normal individuals, the cutoff value was 85%. The results of the antibody test correlated well with that of Southern blots. Sensitivity of the test was 100% and specificity was 97.5%. This noninvasive test requires one or two drops of blood and is rapid, simple, and cheap, making it an ideal choice for large screening large groups of male mental retardates and neonates for FXS in developing countries such as India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.