Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15899929›Full record

SynthesisArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2005

Erythromycin as a prokinetic agent in preterm neonates: a systematic review.

S Patole, S Rao, D Doherty

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Erythromycin and feeding intolerance in premature infants: a randomized trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2007
    Trial
  3. Safety and Efficacy of Oral Azithromycin for Gastrointestinal Dysmotility in Pediatric Patients.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Dilemmas in feeding infants with intestinal failure: a neonatologist's perspective.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  6. [Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm infants (2020)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S PatoleDepartment of Neonatal Paediatrics, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6008. skpatole@hotmail.com
S Rao
D Doherty
University of Western Australia · AUWomen and Infants Research Foundation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt often takes several days or even weeks to establish full enteral feeds (FEFs) in preterm, especially extremely low birthweight neonates because of feed intolerance related to gastrointestinal hypomotility. Clinical trials of erythromycin as a prokinetic agent in preterm neonates have reported conflicting results.

aimTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of erythromycin as a prokinetic agent in preterm neonates.

methodsOnly randomised controlled trials in preterm neonates (gestation < or = 37 weeks) were considered eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the time to reach FEFs of 150 ml/kg/day. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of erythromycin related adverse effects such as diarrhoea, cardiac arrhythmias, and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. No restrictions were applied on the dose (low: 3-12 mg/kg/day; antimicrobial: > or = 12 mg/kg/6-8 hours) and route (oral or intravenous) and mode (prophylactic or rescue) of administration. The standard methodology for systematic reviews was followed. A subgroup analysis was pre-planned based on the dose and mode of drug administration.

resultsSeven trials (three prophylaxis, four rescue) with various doses, routes and modes of administration, and durations of erythromycin treatment and different results were found to be eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Meta-analysis could not be performed, as specific data were either inadequate or not available.

conclusionThe conflicting trial results may be explained by differences in dose and route and mode of administration of erythromycin and in gastrointestinal motor responses in the presence of different feeding conditions-for example, fasting v fed state, intermittent v continuous feeds. Gestational and postnatal ages during erythromycin treatment are also important.

Indexed as

ErythromycinGastrointestinal AgentsGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal MotilityHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesErythromycinGastrointestinal Agents

Identifiers

PMID15899929
PMCPMC1721900
OpenAlexW2115951422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.