Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15899211›Full record

Trial reportClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2005

A phase II study of vinorelbine and estramustine in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer.

Joan Carles Galcerán, Romà Bastus Piulats, Javier Martín-Broto, Pablo Maroto Rey, Miquel Nogué Aligué, Montserrat Domenech Santasusana, Angels Arcusa Lanza, Joaquim Bellmunt Molins, Catherine Colin, Atika Girard

Abstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Joan Carles GalceránOncology Unit, Hospital del Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. jcarles@imas.imim.es
Romà Bastus Piulats
Javier Martín-Broto
Pablo Maroto Rey
Miquel Nogué Aligué
Montserrat Domenech Santasusana
Angels Arcusa Lanza
Joaquim Bellmunt Molins
Catherine Colin
Atika Girard
Pierre Fabre (France) · FRDeleted InstitutionFundació CTM Centre Tecnològic · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Terrassa · ESHospital Universitario Son Dureta · ESInstitut Municipal d'Assistència Sanitària · ESUniversity Hospital Mútua de Terrassa · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of vinorelbine in combination with estramustine in patients with chemotherapy-naïve hormone-refractory prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients received vinorelbine (i.v. 25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks and estramustine (oral, 600 mg/m2) daily. Eligible patients were required to have progressive metastatic disease following the first hormonal manipulation.

resultsOf the 51 patients enrolled (median age = 69 years), 84% presented bone involvement and 75% had at least two organs involved at the time of study entry and 47 were evaluable for treatment efficacy. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response (> or =50% decrease) which was the primary efficacy criterion was reported in 21 patients (41.2%) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in 20 patients (48.8%) in the per protocol (PP) population. Of the 7 patients with measurable disease, 2 achieved partial response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.7 months (range: 1.9-8.6) and 14.3 months (range: 4.2-21.2), respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 6.1% of patients and in 1% of cycles. The incidence of complicated neutropenia (febrile neutropenia reported in 1 patient and septic shock with severe neutropenia reported in 2 patients) was 5.8%. The most frequent grade 3-4 non-haematological events (% of patients > or =5%) included anorexia (10%), thrombosis/embolism (8%), vomiting and hypotension (6% each). There were 3 toxic deaths (5.9 %) resulting from pulmonary embolism, angina pectoris, and septic shock. The impact of combined chemotherapy on the quality-of-life (QL) of the patients was assessed between baseline and the first evaluation scheduled at 6 weeks indicated a marked reduction in pain while the rest of the symptoms remained stable. Overall, health status improved slightly over the treatment period.

conclusionsThis study confirmed that the combination of vinorelbine and estramustine is an active regimen in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer who had not been treated previously with chemotherapy. Main toxicities included complicated neutropenia even though the incidence of severe neutropenia was low. We observed a higher incidence of toxic deaths which could have been related to the regimen of estramustine used in the study.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEstramustineHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsVinblastineVinorelbineAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicEstramustineVinblastineVinorelbine

Identifiers

PMID15899211
OpenAlexW2060598630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.