Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15897183›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2005

Basic mechanism of eukaryotic chromosome segregation.

Mitsuhiro Yanagida

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. iScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. TipN's involvement with centromere segregation in Caulobacter crescentus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Centrosome instability: when good centrosomes go bad.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The role of model organisms in the history of mitosis research.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2C: molecular biology, role in tumorigenesis, and potential as a biomarker.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mitsuhiro YanagidaDepartment of Gene Mechanisms, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. yanagida@kozo.lif.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We now have firm evidence that the basic mechanism of chromosome segregation is similar among diverse eukaryotes as the same genes are employed. Even in prokaryotes, the very basic feature of chromosome segregation has similarities to that of eukaryotes. Many aspects of chromosome segregation are closely related to a cell cycle control that includes stage-specific protein modification and proteolysis. Destruction of mitotic cyclin and securin leads to mitotic exit and separase activation, respectively. Key players in chromosome segregation are SMC-containing cohesin and condensin, DNA topoisomerase II, APC/C ubiquitin ligase, securin-separase complex, aurora passengers, and kinetochore microtubule destabilizers or regulators. In addition, the formation of mitotic kinetochore and spindle apparatus is absolutely essential. The roles of principal players in basic chromosome segregation are discussed: most players have interphase as well as mitotic functions. A view on how the centromere/kinetochore is formed is described.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdenosine TriphosphatasesCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCentromereChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosome SegregationCohesinsCyclinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIEndopeptidasesEukaryotic CellsFungal ProteinsKinetochoresMultiprotein ComplexesAdenosine TriphosphatasesCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinscondensin complexesCyclinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIEndopeptidasesESP1 protein, S cerevisiaeFungal ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesNuclear ProteinsPDS1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSecurinSeparaseUbiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes

Identifiers

PMID15897183
PMCPMC1569467
OpenAlexW2119963286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.