ReviewDer Anaesthesist2005
[Preoperative abstinence from smoking. An outdated dogma in anaesthesia?].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Anesthesia for medical students : A brief guide to practical anesthesia in adults with a web-based video illustration].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Review
- [Postoperative wound infections. Pathophysiology, risk factors and preventive concepts].Der Anaesthesist · 2010Review
- [Preoperative fasting 2008: medical behaviour between empiricism and science].Der Anaesthesist · 2008Review
- [Postoperative pulmonary complications: prophylaxis after noncardiac surgery].Der Anaesthesist · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For decades it has been assumed, that smoking within 6 hours of anesthesia and surgery raises the incidence of perioperative cardiopulmonary complications (PPC) including aspiration. Therefore, every patient is advised to stop smoking at the day before surgery, and not to smoke at all at the day of surgery. If the patient does not follow this advice, this will result in a postponement of anesthesia and surgery. The present article aims at re-investigating the scientific basis of this dogma in anesthesia, which virtually forbids smoking at short-term prior to surgery. The influence of short-term (6 h) abstinence from smoking on the perioperative pulmonary morbidity has not been systematically investigated. Interestingly, giving up smoking less than two months prior to surgery does not significantly decrease, but rather may increase the incidence of PPC. With respect to the risk of aspiration, smoking does not increase either the volume or the acidity of gastric juices. A short-lived reduction in the tone of the lower esophageal sphincter is reversible within minutes after termination of smoking. While the emptying of liquid gastric juices is not influenced by smoking, there is a certain delay in the propulgation of solid food. This effect, however, is probably of no clinical relevance in patients, who had their last solid meal the evening before surgery. Hence, we conclude that the anesthesia dogma, which rules out smoking shortly prior to anesthesia, cannot be based on an otherwise increased incidence of pulmonary aspiration or other pulmonary morbidity. However, acute smoking (probably by an increase in COHb) may increase the incidence of myocardial ischemia during exercise and anesthesia. With reference to this possible cardiac complication it still seems reasonable to discourage smoking at least 12 to 48 hours prior to surgery in patients with elevated cardiac risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15895200What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.