ArticleParasitology research1992
Dose-dependent recovery of adult Acanthocheilonema viteae (Nematoda: Filarioidea) after single and trickle inoculations in jirds.
Article in Parasitology research, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A comprehensive, model-based review of vaccine and repeat infection trials for filariasis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2013Review
- Type 2 immune-inducing helminth vaccination maintains protective efficacy in the setting of repeated parasite exposures.Vaccine · 2010Article
- Host protective immunity and vaccine development studies in lymphatic filariasis.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing single doses of 5, 15, 30, 60 and 90 third-stage Acanthocheilonema viteae larvae per animal were inoculated into jirds. The adult worm load increased steadily, whereas the recovery rate decreased significantly, i.e. the correlation between dose and recovery was negative (rs, -0.90; n = 5; alpha, 0.05). The same inoculation doses were given as trickle inoculations of 5 L3 each (3 x 5, 6 x 5, 12 x 5, 18 x 5) at intervals of 2-6 days throughout the prepatency period. Irrespective of the number of repeated inoculations, a rather constant but low load of 7-10 worms/animal was reached. The recovery rate decreased drastically (rs, -1.0; n = 5). When trickle inoculations were carried out in animals exhibiting patient infections, the superinoculated larvae seemed to be destroyed almost completely; thus, a parasite-host equilibrium was guaranteed in all cases. The immunological background is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.