ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005
Building a framework for trust: critical event analysis of deaths in surgical care.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors affecting patients' trust in physicians in the cases of prescribing invasive interventions among musculoskeletal patients referring to clinics in Shiraz, 2023: a discrete choice experiment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Overview of surgical training and assessment of surgical skills: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Observations from Australia's National Surgical Mortality Audit.World journal of surgery · 2023Observational
- Article
- Causes of death after emergency general surgical admission: population cohort study of mortality.BJS open · 2021Article
- Twenty-year study of in-hospital and postdischarge mortality following emergency general surgical admission.BJS open · 2019Article
- Impact of laparoscopic approach in emergency major abdominal surgery: single-centre analysis of 748 consecutive cases.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018Article
- Pre-NELA vs NELA - has anything changed, or is it just an audit exercise?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2016Article
- Surgical Mortality Audit-lessons Learned in a Developing Nation.International surgery · 2015Article
- Reduction in gastric cancer surgical mortality over 10 years: An adverse events analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2014Article
- Obesity does not increase mortality after emergency surgery.Journal of obesity · 2014Article
- Centralization of services and reduction of adverse events in pancreatic cancer surgery.World journal of surgery · 2013Article
- Article
- Mortality associated with the treatment of gallstone disease: a 10-year contemporary national experience.World journal of surgery · 2011Article
- Characteristics of patients dying within 30 days of diagnosis of breast or colorectal cancer in Scotland, 2003-2007.British journal of cancer · 2011Article
- Risk management in pediatric surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2009Article
- Quality and safety in surgical care.Annals of surgery · 2006Article
- Scottish model for surgical mortality used in Australasia.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
- Excellent review scheme for critical incidents but insufficient for revalidation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
- Monitoring surgical mortality.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.