ArticleJournal of virology2005
Paleogenomic record of the extinction of human endogenous retrovirus ERV9.
Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Binding of NF-Y to transposable elements in mouse and human cells.Mobile DNA · 2025Article
- Viral influencers: deciphering the role of endogenous retroviral LTR12 repeats in cellular gene expression.Journal of virology · 2025Review
- Mutation Rate Variation and Other Challenges in 2-LTR Dating of Primate Endogenous Retrovirus Integrations.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Review
- Endogenous retroviral solo-LTRs in human genome.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- KRAB zinc finger protein ZNF676 controls the transcriptional influence of LTR12-related endogenous retrovirus sequences.Mobile DNA · 2022Article
- HIV-1 infection activates endogenous retroviral promoters regulating antiviral gene expression.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Transcriptional Modulation of Human Endogenous Retroviruses in Primary CD4+ T Cells Following Vorinostat Treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Comprehensive identification of genes driven by ERV9-LTRs reveals TNFRSF10B as a re-activatable mediator of testicular cancer cell death.Cell death and differentiation · 2016Article
- Article
- Endogenous retrovirus drives hitherto unknown proapoptotic p63 isoforms in the male germ line of humans and great apes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011Article
- Impact of endogenous intronic retroviruses on major histocompatibility complex class II diversity and stability.Journal of virology · 2008Article
- Expression profiles of endogenous retroviruses in Old World monkeys.Journal of virology · 2006Article
- Adaptive evolution and antiviral activity of the conserved mammalian cytidine deaminase APOBEC3H.Journal of virology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An outstanding question of genome evolution is what stops the invasion of a host genome by transposable elements (TEs). The human genome, harboring the remnants of many extinct TE families, offers an extraordinary opportunity to investigate this problem. ERV9 is an endogenous retrovirus repeatedly mobilized during primate evolution, 15 to 6 million years ago (MYA), which left a trace of over a hundred provirus-like copies and at least 4,000 solitary long terminal repeats (LTRs) in the human genome. Then, its proliferation ceased for unknown reasons, and the family went extinct. We have made a detailed reconstruction of its last active subfamily, ERV9_XII, by examining 115 solitary LTRs from it. These insertions were grouped into 11 sets according to shared nucleotide variants, which could be placed in a sequential order of 10 to 6 MYA. At least 75% of the subfamily was produced 8 to 6 MYA, during a stage of intense proliferation. With new analytical tools, we show that the youngest and most prolific sets may have been produced by effectively instantaneous expansions of corresponding single-sequence variants. The extinction of this family apparently was not a consequence of its slow gradual degeneration, but the outcome of the fixation of specific restrictive alleles in the human-chimpanzee ancestral population. Three species-specific insertions (two in humans and one in chimpanzees) were identified, further supporting that extinction took place when these two species were beginning to diverge. These are the only fixed differences of this kind so far observed between humans and chimpanzees, apart from those belonging to the human endogenous retrovirus K family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.