Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15889258›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2005

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as a tool for functional genomics in fungi.

Caroline B Michielse, Paul J J Hooykaas, Cees A M J J van den Hondel, Arthur F J Ram

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 507 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role ofmBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Establishment of anCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline B MichielseInstitute of Biology, Clusius Laboratory, Fungal Genetics Research Group, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 64, 2333 AL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Paul J J Hooykaas
Cees A M J J van den Hondel
Arthur F J Ram
Leiden University · NLPension Fund for Care and Well-Being · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of functional genomics, the need for tools to perform large-scale targeted and random mutagenesis is increasing. A potential tool is Agrobacterium-mediated fungal transformation. A. tumefaciens is able to transfer a part of its DNA (transferred DNA; T-DNA) to a wide variety of fungi and the number of fungi that can be transformed by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (AMT) is still increasing. AMT has especially opened the field of molecular genetics for fungi that were difficult to transform with traditional methods or for which the traditional protocols failed to yield stable DNA integration. Because of the simplicity and efficiency of transformation via A. tumefaciens, it is relatively easy to generate a large number of stable transformants. In combination with the finding that the T-DNA integrates randomly and predominantly as a single copy, AMT is well suited to perform insertional mutagenesis in fungi. In addition, in various gene-targeting experiments, high homologous recombination frequencies were obtained, indicating that the T-DNA is also a useful substrate for targeted mutagenesis. In this review, we discuss the potential of the Agrobacterium DNA transfer system to be used as a tool for targeted and random mutagenesis in fungi.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalMutagenesis, Site-DirectedBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceDNA, FungalGenomicsMutagenesis, InsertionalPlasmidsRhizobiumSaccharomyces cerevisiaeBacterial ProteinsDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID15889258
OpenAlexW2164261080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.