ArticleMolecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology2004
Retinoblastoma: genetic testing versus conventional clinical screening in India.
Article in Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ethical, social, and cultural issues related to clinical genetic testing and counseling in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Pooled it
- Mutational analysis of theFrontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical evaluation of RB1 genetic testing reveals novel mutations in Vietnamese patients with retinoblastoma.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- An Online Application for Retinoblastoma Surveillance.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2020Article
- Mutational analysis of the RB1 gene and the inheritance patterns of retinoblastoma in Jordan.Familial cancer · 2018Article
- Ethical, social, and cultural issues related to clinical genetic testing and counseling in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2017Article
- Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGenetic testing is increasingly being used to evaluate susceptibility to hereditary diseases because it is a cost effective screening method. Predictive testing for retinoblastoma can help to save the vision and avoid unnecessary (and invasive) eye examinations for probands and their close relatives. This study was undertaken to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the retinoblastoma genetic screening strategy established in our hospital. STUDY
designCytogenetic study of peripheral blood, mutational, and methylation analyses from the tumor DNA of 25 patients with retinoblastoma was undertaken. The cost for retinoblastoma (RB1) gene screening was calculated based on the cost of the chemicals and consumables used and the clinical examination charges at our hospital. A comparison was made between the cost of genetic screening and clinical testing for retinoblastoma. Retinoblastoma patients underwent clinical management and genetic testing at Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India.
resultsBy adopting a genetic screening strategy, a 3.5-fold cost saving was seen for a proband while a 6-fold saving was seen for a family with two sibs compared to the cost of clinical examination. The clinical examination fee and cost of genetic screening for a proband was dollarUS536 and dollarUS152, respectively, while for a nuclear family with two sibs the costs were dollarUS1071 and dollarUS175, respectively. DISCUSSION: Savings for a family will be higher if indirect costs, such as savings in travel times to and from the hospital and labor savings, were taken into account. Cost will be a major factor in determining the implementation of genetic screening for RB1 gene in the clinical practice.
conclusionIn our study in India, genetic screening for retinoblastoma was cheaper than conventional screening and was useful in the genetic counseling of the families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.