Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15887013›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2006

Chaperone-rich cell lysates, immune activation and tumor vaccination.

Yi Zeng, Michael W Graner, Emmanuel Katsanis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cell journal · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Different Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Tumor Cell Lysates (TCLs) Induce Discrepant Anti-Tumor Immunity by PD1/PDL-1 Interaction.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Immunogenic Apoptosis as a Novel Tool for Anticancer Vaccine Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi ZengDepartment of Pediatrics, Steele Memorial Children's Research Center, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave., PO Box 245073, Tucson, AZ 85724-5073, USA.
Michael W Graner
Emmanuel Katsanis
University of Arizona · USDuke University · US

Funding

Immunotherapy for Chronic Myelogenous LeukemiaR01CA104926 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI KATSANIS, EMMANUEL · 2004 to 2013
$2.4M
Chaperone rich cell lysates (CRCL)Natural adjuvants and*R21CA102410 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI KATSANIS, EMMANUEL · 2003 to 2004
$452k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104926NCI NIH HHS R21 CA102410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have utilized a free-solution-isoelectric focusing technique (FS-IEF) to obtain chaperone-rich cell lysates (CRCL) fractions from clarified tumor homogenates. The FS-IEF technique for enriching multiple chaperones from tumor lysate is relatively easy and rapid, yielding sufficient immunogenic material for clinical use. We have shown that tumor-derived CRCL carry antigenic peptides. Dendritic cells (DCs) uptake CRCL and cross-present the chaperoned peptides to T cells. Tumor-derived CRCL induce protective immune responses against a diverse range of murine tumor types in different genetic backgrounds. When compared to purified heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), single antigenic peptide or unfractionated lysate, CRCL have superior ability to activate/mature DCs and are able to induce potent, long lasting and tumor specific T-cell-mediated immunity. While CRCL vaccines were effective as stand-alone therapies, the enhanced immunogenicity arising from CRCL-pulsed DC as a vaccine indicates that CRCL could be the antigen source of choice for DC-based anti-cancer immunotherapies. The nature of CRCL's enhanced immunogenicity may lie in the broader antigenic peptide repertoire as well as the superior immune activation capacity of CRCL. Exongenous CRCL also supply danger signals in the context of apoptotic tumor cells and enhance the immunogenicity of apoptotic tumor cells, leading to tumor-specific T cell dependent long-term immunity. Moreover, CRCL based vaccines can be effectively combined with chemotherapy to treat cancer. Our findings indicate that CRCL have prominent adjuvant effects and are effective sources of tumor antigens for pulsing DCs. Tumor-derived CRCL are promising anti-cancer vaccines that warrant clinical research and development.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesDendritic CellsHeat-Shock ProteinsHumansLymphocyte ActivationNeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesHeat-Shock Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15887013
PMCPMC11030847
OpenAlexW2061561495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.