ReviewScience progress2004
Applied and ecological aspects of oxidative-stress damage to bacterial spores and to oral microbes.
Review in Science progress, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Microbiome on Breast Cancer and Regulatory Strategies.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- The Influence of Diet on Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Induced by Bacterial Biofilms in the Human Oral Cavity.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Two Spx proteins modulate stress tolerance, survival, and virulence in Streptococcus mutans.Journal of bacteriology · 2010Article
- Responses to chemical, physical and biological stresses: involvement of extracellular alarmones, pheromones and varisensors.Science progress · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial cells have adapted in a variety of ways to resist oxidative stresses and damage in their everyday lives in a predominantly aerobic world. The nearly universal occurrence of resistance mechanisms against oxidative stresses, particularly those due to reactive oxygen species (ROS), suggests that most, if not all, bacteria have to deal with oxidative assaults. A primary source of oxidative stress is aerobic metabolism, which leads to production of ROS such as hydrogen peroxide, superoxide radical, perhydroxyl radical, hydroxyl radical and a variety of other toxic metabolites, including organic peroxides and other organics or inorganics able to transfer electrons to sites of oxidative damage. Anaerobes as well as aerobic and facultative organisms are subject to oxidative stresses, often as a result of their own metabolism of O2 or that of associated facultative organisms. If anaerobes would just ignore oxygen instead of metabolizing it, they would not have to deal with toxic metabolites of their own making. Another major source of oxidative stress comes from the use of oxidative agents in the disinfection-sterilization industry. Notable examples are hypochlorite for water purification and hydrogen peroxide used for industrial sterilization. Antimicrobials such as isoniazide and mitomycin C also act oxidatively to cause damage. In this article, aseptic packaging and processing involving use of hydrogen peroxide for sterilization of packaging materials is reviewed as an example of oxidative stress imposed on bacterial spores and vegetative cells from outside the organisms or the microbial community. The other example considered is related to oral microbiology and infectious disease in which oxidative stress may arise from the metabolism of the oral microbiota or may come from outside through use of oral care products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.