Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15883703›Full record

ReviewFamilial cancer2005

Molecular pathogenesis of MEN2-associated tumors.

Christian A Koch

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Familial cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Somatic genomic profiling reveals clinically relevant heterogeneity inJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Flushing in (neuro)endocrinology.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2016
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes associated with mutation of p27.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian A KochUniversity of Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthalstr. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. kocc@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Leipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the gene responsible for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) was discovered many years ago, the exact mechanisms of tumor development in patients affected with RET germline mutations remain unknown. In vitro studies have certain pitfalls, one of which is the use of cell culture systems such as the NIH3T3 cells, in which RET usually is not expressed in contrast to the in vivo situation. Recent data suggest that an overrepresentation of mutant RET as a 'second hit' event might trigger tumorigenesis. However, alterations in other genes might contribute to this overrepresentation of RET or impact on MEN 2-related tumor development through completely different mechanisms and pathways. The final goal of further elucidating the natural history and pathogenesis of MEN2-related tumors should be the chance to offer patients with RET germline mutations an optimal cancer prevention (e.g. codon specific recommendations for prophylactic thyroidectomy) and treatment program, especially for metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma for which presently no effective therapy other than surgery exists.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell Transformation, NeoplasticGerm-Line MutationHumansMultiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2aOncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesOncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesRET protein, human

Identifiers

PMID15883703
OpenAlexW2018413522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.