ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005
Detecting remotely related proteins by their interactions and sequence similarity.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phosphatase POPX2 interferes with cell cycle by interacting with Chk1.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2020Article
- Simplified method to predict mutual interactions of human transcription factors based on their primary structure.PloS one · 2011Article
- Bioinformatics annotation of the hypothetical proteins found by omics techniques can help to disclose additional virulence factors.Current microbiology · 2009Review
- ModLink+: improving fold recognition by using protein-protein interactions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2009Article
- Prediction of enzyme function by combining sequence similarity and protein interactions.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
- Protein networks in disease.Genome research · 2008Review
- Improving model construction of profile HMMs for remote homology detection through structural alignment.BMC bioinformatics · 2007Article
- Characterization of protein hubs by inferring interacting motifs from protein interactions.PLoS computational biology · 2007Article
- Systematic identification of functional orthologs based on protein network comparison.Genome research · 2006Article
- Comparative modelling of protein structure and its impact on microbial cell factories.Microbial cell factories · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The function of an uncharacterized protein is usually inferred either from its homology to, or its interactions with, characterized proteins. Here, we use both sequence similarity and protein interactions to identify relationships between remotely related protein sequences. We rely on the fact that homologous sequences share similar interactions, and, therefore, the set of interacting partners of the partners of a given protein is enriched by its homologs. The approach was bench-marked by assigning the fold and functional family to test sequences of known structure. Specifically, we relied on 1,434 proteins with known folds, as defined in the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database, and with known interacting partners, as defined in the Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP). For this subset, the specificity of fold assignment was increased from 54% for position-specific iterative BLAST to 75% for our approach, with a concomitant increase in sensitivity for a few percentage points. Similarly, the specificity of family assignment at the e-value threshold of 10(-8) was increased from 70% to 87%. The proposed method would be a useful tool for large-scale automated discovery of remote relationships between protein sequences, given its unique reliance on sequence similarity and protein-protein interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.