Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15883367›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Genomic and proteomic comparisons between bacterial and archaeal genomes and related comparisons with the yeast and fly genomes.

Samuel Karlin, Luciano Brocchieri, Allan Campbell, Martha Cyert, Jan Mrázek

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Distinguishing features of delta-proteobacterial genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Statistical signals in bioinformatics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Review
  12. Predicted highly expressed genes in archaeal genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel KarlinDepartment of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2125, USA. karlin@math.stanford.edu
Luciano Brocchieri
Allan Campbell
Martha Cyert
Jan Mrázek
Stanford University · US

Funding

THEORY &APPLIED STUDIES IN EVOLUTIONARY GENETICSR01GM010452 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KARLIN, SAMUEL · 1985 to 2006
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM10452-40NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM010452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial, archaeal, yeast, and fly genomes are compared with respect to predicted highly expressed (PHX) genes and several genomic properties. There is a striking difference in the status of PHX ribosomal protein (RP) genes where the archaeal genome generally encodes more RP genes and fewer PHX RPs compared with bacterial genomes. The increase in RPs in archaea and eukaryotes compared with that in bacteria may reflect a more complex set of interactions in archaea and eukaryotes in regulating translation, e.g., differences in structure requiring scaffolding of longer rRNA molecules, expanded interactions with the chaperone machinery, and, in eukaryotic interactions with endoplasmic reticulum components. The yeast genome is similar to fast-growing bacteria in PHX genes but also features several cytoskeletal genes, including actin and tropomyosin, and several signal transduction regulatory proteins from the 14.3.3 family. The most PHX genes of Drosophila encode cytoskeletal and exoskeletal proteins. We found that the preference of a microorganism for an anaerobic metabolism correlates with the number of PHX enzymes of the glycolysis pathway that well exceeds the number of PHX enzymes acting in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Conversely, if the number of PHX enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid cycle well exceeds the PHX enzymes of glycolysis, an aerobic metabolism is preferred. Where the numbers are approximately commensurate, a facultative growth behavior prevails.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGenomicsProteomicsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidReplication OriginRibosomal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeRibosomal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15883367
PMCPMC1129125
OpenAlexW2019003066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.