Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15882472›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2005

The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review.

Edward Broughton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Reverse Risk Register Approach to Understanding Systemic Factors in Risk Analysis and Management Case Studies.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Numerical Investigation of Overtopping Prevention for Optimal Safety Dike Design.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Morphology-driven gas sensing by fabricated fractals: A review.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Edward BroughtonColumbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, 600 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA. eib6@columbia.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On December 3 1984, more than 40 tons of methyl isocyanate gas leaked from a pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, immediately killing at least 3,800 people and causing significant morbidity and premature death for many thousands more. The company involved in what became the worst industrial accident in history immediately tried to dissociate itself from legal responsibility. Eventually it reached a settlement with the Indian Government through mediation of that country's Supreme Court and accepted moral responsibility. It paid $470 million in compensation, a relatively small amount of based on significant underestimations of the long-term health consequences of exposure and the number of people exposed. The disaster indicated a need for enforceable international standards for environmental safety, preventative strategies to avoid similar accidents and industrial disaster preparedness. Since the disaster, India has experienced rapid industrialization. While some positive changes in government policy and behavior of a few industries have taken place, major threats to the environment from rapid and poorly regulated industrial growth remain. Widespread environmental degradation with significant adverse human health consequences continues to occur throughout India.

Indexed as

Accidents, OccupationalDisastersChemical IndustryDeceptionDeveloping CountriesEnvironmental ExposureExplosionsGas PoisoningHumansIndiaIndustryIsocyanatesLiability, LegalUrban PopulationIsocyanatesmethyl isocyanate

Identifiers

PMID15882472
PMCPMC1142333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.