ArticleThe Biochemical journal2005
Binding and repression of translation of the cognate mRNA by Trichinella spiralis thymidylate synthase differ from the corresponding interactions of the human enzyme.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variants of human thymidylate synthase with loop 181-197 stabilized in the inactive conformation.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2007-03-15Error in Image ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thymidylate synthase (TS) of Trichinella spiralis, a parasitic nematode causing trichinellosis, was found to bind its own mRNA and repress translation of the latter, similar to its human counter-part [Chu, Koeller, Casey, Drake, Chabner, Elwood, Zinn and Allegra (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 8977-8981]. However, in striking contrast with human TS, the parasite enzyme's interaction with mRNA was not affected by any of the substrate (deoxyuridylate or N(5,10)-methylenetetrahydrofolate) nor by the inhibitor (fluorodeoxyuridylate; used alone or in the presence of N(5,10)-methylenetetrahydrofolate) similar to that shown for the bifunctional enzyme from Plasmodium falciparum [Zhang and Rathod (2002) Science 296, 545-547]. Moreover, repression of the translation of the parasite enzyme was enhanced by the same ligands that were shown by others (Chu et al., 1991) to prevent human TS from impairing its translation. On comparing the capacity of TS to bind to its cognate mRNA, relative to its ability to inhibit its translation, the same enzyme preparation was active as translational repressor at a considerably lower protein/mRNA ratio, suggesting the two phenomena to be disconnected. Of interest is the fact that the presence of the enzyme protein N-terminal methionine proved to be critical for binding, but not for repression of its translation, indicating that mRNA binding requires a methionine or an adduct (i.e. methionine-histidine) at the N-terminus of TS, but that the translational repression effect does not. Notably, chicken liver dihydrofolate reductase, which is incapable of binding to T. spiralis TS mRNA, repressed the translation of TS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.