ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2004
Two components of the human alcohol electro-oculogram.
Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Light and alcohol evoked electro-oculograms in cystic fibrosis.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Light onset or drinking alcohol causes the standing potential of the eye to rise and then fall to a trough (the EOG). After allowing for the time for the alcohol to be absorbed into the blood stream, the changes of current with time are identical for the two agents but each acts through a separate pathway, on the same effector mechanism. We have shown that +ve and -ve processes of the alcohol-EOG may be differentially affected in disease. We have now determined the separate dose-response relationship of the two voltage changes. Alcohol diluted with water was given by mouth to fasting dark-adapted subjects. Recordings continued until both the positive peak and the later negative trough were well-characterised. Doses of alcohol ranged from 3.54 to 450 mg Kg(-1) of body weight. Experiments were carried out on three normal subjects, 4-8th decade. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that each voltage change is determined by the relation: [EtOH] x [R] <--> [EtOH.R], where <--> represents a reversible reaction. For the +ve peak, semi-saturation occurs at approximately 35 mg Kg(-l). For the -ve trough it is smaller, 11 mg Kg(-l). Therefore the result is consistent with there being 2 distinct processes, and the human EOG cannot be a single 'damped oscillation'. During the short period when change of blood alcohol concentration is effective in causing the EOG sequence (using doses which provoke large voltage changes), the computed blood concentration varies from 0.01 to 0.1 mM, i.e. is > 2 orders of magnitude less than the levels required for intoxication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.