ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005
Effect of combinations of drugs on all cause mortality in patients with ischaemic heart disease: nested case-control analysis.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of evidence-based therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins.American journal of epidemiology · 2012Pooled it
- Socioeconomic, demographic, and medication class determinants of medication adherence: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Treating Cardiovascular Disorders with Personalized Medicine.Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Review
- Clinical Profile and Management of Patient Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease and/or Peripheral Artery Disease in Clinical Practice: The APALUSA Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Independent effects of 15 commonly prescribed drugs on all-cause mortality among US elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2020Article
- Strengths and Limitations of Using the Polypill in Cardiovascular Prevention.Current cardiology reports · 2017Review
- Associations between body fat variability and later onset of cardiovascular disease risk factors.PloS one · 2017Article
- Cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric risks of varenicline: a retrospective cohort study.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2015Article
- Observational
- Cost-effectiveness of optimal use of acute myocardial infarction treatments and impact on coronary heart disease mortality in China.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2014Article
- Scaling up chronic disease prevention interventions in lower- and middle-income countries.Annual review of public health · 2013Review
- Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2012Review
- The UK pay-for-performance programme in primary care: estimation of population mortality reduction.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010Article
- Polypill: lights and shadows.Current hypertension reports · 2010Review
- Reasons for not meeting coronary artery disease targets of care in ambulatory practice.The Permanente journal · 2010Article
- Costs and benefits of free medications after myocardial infarction.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2009Article
- Perioperative handling of antiplatelet therapy: watching the two sides of the coin.Internal and emergency medicine · 2009Article
- Partnering care delivery and research to optimize health.Clinical medicine & research · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the effect of combinations of statins, aspirin, beta blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in the secondary prevention of all cause mortality in patients with ischaemic heart disease.
designOpen prospective cohort study with nested case-control analysis.
setting1.18 million patients registered with 89 general practices across 23 strategic health authority areas within the United Kingdom. Practices had longitudinal data for a minimum of eight years and were contributing to QRESEARCH, a new database. PATIENTS: All patients with a first diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease between January 1996 and December 2003. Cases were patients with ischaemic heart disease who died. Controls were patients with ischaemic heart disease who were matched for age, sex, and year of diagnosis and were alive at the time their matched case died.
main outcome measuresOdds ratio with 95% confidence interval for risk of death in cases compared with controls. Exposure was current use of different combinations of statins, aspirin, beta blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors before death in cases, or the equivalent date in controls.
results13,029 patients had a first diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease (incidence rate 338 per 100,000 person years). 2266 cases were matched to 9064 controls. Drug combinations associated with the greatest reduction in all cause mortality were statins, aspirin, and beta blockers (83% reduction, 95% confidence interval 77% to 88%); statins, aspirin, beta blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (75% reduction, 65% to 82%); and statins, aspirin, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (71% reduction, 59% to 79%). Treatments associated with the smallest reduction in all cause mortality were beta blockers alone (19% reduction, 37% reduction to 4% increase), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors alone (20% reduction, 1% to 35%), and combined statins and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (31% reduction, 57% reduction to 12% increase).
conclusionsCombinations of statins, aspirins, and beta blockers improve survival in high risk patients with cardiovascular disease, although the addition of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor conferred no additional benefit despite the analysis being adjusted for congestive cardiac failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.