Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15878786›Full record

ReviewAntiviral research2005

Development of antiviral therapy for severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Jindrich Cinatl, Martin Michaelis, Gerold Hoever, Wolfgang Preiser, Hans Wilhelm Doerr

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antiviral research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent Advances in Antiviral Activities of Triterpenoids.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Repurposing Nucleoside Analogs for Human Coronaviruses.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jindrich CinatlInstitut für Medizinische Virologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Paul Ehrlich-Str. 40, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Cinatl@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Martin Michaelis
Gerold Hoever
Wolfgang Preiser
Hans Wilhelm Doerr
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new disease, the severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARS), caused by the SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), emerged at the beginning of 2003 and rapidly spread throughout the world. Although the disease had disappeared in June 2003 its re-emergence cannot be excluded. The development of vaccines against SARS-CoV may take years. Therefore, the availability of effective antiviral drugs against SARS-CoV may be crucial for the control of future SARS outbreaks. In this review, experimental and clinical data about potential anti-SARS drugs is summarised and discussed. Animal model studies will be needed to help to determine which interventions warrant controlled clinical testing.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAnimalsAntiviral AgentsCoronavirus InfectionsDrug DesignHumansSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusViral VaccinesAntiviral AgentsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID15878786
PMCPMC7132397
OpenAlexW2047933877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.