ArticleGene therapy2005
In vivo NMR imaging evaluation of efficiency and toxicity of gene electrotransfer in rat muscle.
Article in Gene therapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dendritic cell vaccination combined with irreversible electroporation for treating pancreatic cancer-a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Review
- MRI study on reversible and irreversible electroporation induced blood brain barrier disruption.PloS one · 2012Article
- Article
- Article
- The influence of skeletal muscle anisotropy on electroporation: in vivo study and numerical modeling.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2010Article
- Electric field-mediated transport of plasmid DNA in tumor interstitium in vivo.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2007Article
- Analytical and numerical quantification and comparison of the local electric field in the tissue for different electrode configurations.Biomedical engineering online · 2007Article
- Gene therapy progress and prospects: Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Gene therapy · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vivo gene electrotransfer (ET) is a simple method of gene delivery in various tissues relying on the injection of plasmid DNA followed by application of electric pulses. Noninvasive tools are needed to evaluate the ET efficiency and the resulting tissue damages. In this study, we performed ET of rat tibialis muscle after injection of either a plasmid coding for luciferase or a contrast agent (CA) detected by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Plasmid expression and CA intracellular trapped quantity were compared throughout the electric field intensity range 0-300 V/cm. Although the CA trapped quantity reflects only the electropermeabilization step, both measurements were correlated. MRI measurements gave easy access to tridimensional visualization of the labelled zones where the CA has been injected and the applied electric field had a value allowing permeabilization. We also performed MRI measurements of the water transverse relaxation time T2 as an indicator of tissue modification, and tested whether another CA specific for necrosis could be used to detect muscle necrosis at high electric field intensity. In conclusion, MRI measurements may bring multiparametric information upon the efficiency and tissue toxicity of an ET protocol by using a simple and safe CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.