ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005
Use of a commercial reagent leads to reduced germ tube production by Candida dubliniensis.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine the factor(s) explaining our inability to detect Candida dubliniensis. When germ tube-positive yeasts were tested for C. dubliniensis, no C. dubliniensis was detected; however, 58 C. dubliniensis strains were detected when germ tube-negative Candida albicans strains were tested further. Since all 58 C. dubliniensis strains detected were germ tube negative, these data implied that false-negative germ tube tests occurred with germ tube solution (GTS; Remel, Lenexa, KS). All 41 known C. dubliniensis strains tested were negative with GTS, whereas 40 were positive with rabbit serum (RS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Results for C. albicans were equivalent in GTS and RS. In conclusion, GTS cannot be used for the detection of C. dubliniensis, and switching from yeast to hyphae in C. dubliniensis is more restricted than in C. albicans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.