ReviewPaediatric drugs2005
Neonatal chlamydial infections: prevention and treatment.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of common neonatal diseases in primary healthcare institutions: neonatal infectious pneumonia (2025)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatricsGuideline
- Antibiotic prophylaxis for ophthalmia neonatorum in Italy: results from a national survey and the Italian intersociety new position statements.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Review
- A study of Ophthalmia Neonatorum in the Central Reion of Ghana: Causative Agents and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns.Global pediatric health · 2021Article
- Review
- Genital Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Adverse Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes in Children and Women in sub-Saharan Africa.International journal of MCH and AIDS · 2021Article
- A Survey of Current Prophylactic Treatment for Ophthalmia Neonatorum in Croatia and a Review of International Preventive Practices.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Pregnancy: The Global Challenge of Preventing Adverse Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.BioMed research international · 2016Review
- Evaluation of preventive effects of colostrum against neonatal conjunctivitis: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of education and health promotion · 2014Article
- Chlamydial pneumonitis: a creepy neonatal disease.Case reports in pediatrics · 2013Article
- Risk factors for neonatal conjunctivitis in babies of HIV-1 infected mothers.Ophthalmic epidemiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal chlamydial infection, which manifests principally as ophthalmia neonatorum (ON) or pneumonia, is a significant cause of neonatal morbidity. Widespread use of silver nitrate drops resulted in a dramatic decline in the incidence of gonococcal ophthalmia but had much less impact on the incidence of neonatal chlamydial infection. Chlamydia trachomatis has become the most common infectious cause of ON in developed countries.A number of prophylactic antibiotic or antiseptic agents have been used to prevent ON. Prophylaxis with 1% silver nitrate ophthalmic drops, 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment, or 1% tetracycline ointment has comparable efficacy for the prevention of chlamydial ophthalmia but does not offer protection against nasopharyngeal colonization or the development of pneumonia. Erythromycin or tetracycline topically have been used as prophylactic agents because of their allegedly superior activity for the prevention of ON and because they produced less chemical conjunctivitis compared with silver nitrate. However, the relative efficacy of these agents for chlamydial infection and the emergence of beta-lactamase-producing Neisseria gonorrheae has raised questions regarding their effectiveness when applied topically for prophylaxis of ON. Compared with these agents, a 2.5% povidone-iodine ophthalmic solution has been found to have greater efficacy for the prevention of ON generally, and chlamydial ophthalmia specifically. In countries where the incidence of ON is very low, an alternative strategy is to institute prenatal screening and treatment of infected mothers, forgo routine neonatal prophylaxis, and follow-up infants after birth for the possible development of infection. For the treatment of chlamydial ophthalmia or pneumonia, oral erythromycin for 2 weeks is recommended; additional topical therapy is unnecessary. However, in approximately 20-30% of infants, therapy will not eradicate the organism and the infant may require a repeat oral course of antibiotics. The few published studies on the use of the new oral macrolide antibiotics, such as azithromycin, roxithromycin, or clarithromycin for chlamydial infections in neonates suggest that these agents may be effective; however, more data on their tolerability and efficacy in this patient group are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.