Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15871047›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2005

The biased distribution of Alus in human isochores might be driven by recombination.

Michael Hackenberg, Pedro Bernaola-Galván, Pedro Carpena, José L Oliver

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The role of LINEs and CpG islands in dosage compensation on the chicken Z chromosome.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2009
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael HackenbergDepartamento de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Spain.
Pedro Bernaola-Galván
Pedro Carpena
José L Oliver
Universidad de Granada · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alu retrotransposons do not show a homogeneous distribution over the human genome but have a higher density in GC-rich (H) than in AT-rich (L) isochores. However, since they preferentially insert into the L isochores, the question arises: What is the evolutionary mechanism that shifts the Alu density maximum from L to H isochores? To disclose the role played by each of the potential mechanisms involved in such biased distribution, we carried out a genome-wide analysis of the density of the Alus as a function of their evolutionary age, isochore membership, and intron vs. intergene location. Since Alus depend on the retrotransposase encoded by the LINE1 elements, we also studied the distribution of LINE1 to provide a complete evolutionary scenario. We consecutively check, and discard, the contributions of the Alu/LINE1 competition for retrotransposase, compositional matching pressure, and Alu overrepresentation in introns. In analyzing the role played by unequal recombination, we scan the genome for Alu trimers, a direct product of Alu-Alu recombination. Through computer simulations, we show that such trimers are much more frequent than expected, the observed/expected ratio being higher in L than in H isochores. This result, together with the known higher selective disadvantage of recombination products in H isochores, points to Alu-Alu recombination as the main agent provoking the density shift of Alus toward the GC-rich parts of the genome. Two independent pieces of evidence-the lower evolutionary divergence shown by recently inserted Alu subfamilies and the higher frequency of old stand-alone Alus in L isochores-support such a conclusion. Other evolutionary factors, such as population bottlenecks during primate speciation, may have accelerated the fast accumulation of Alus in GC-rich isochores.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, GeneticAlgorithmsAlu ElementsBase CompositionComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGenomicsHumansIsochoresLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsRecombination, GeneticIsochores

Identifiers

PMID15871047
OpenAlexW2160927022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.