ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2005
The hydrophobicity of the H3 histone fold differs from the hydrophobicity of the other three folds.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A protein self-assembly model guided by electrostatic and hydrophobic dipole moments.PloS one · 2019Article
- Asymmetry in the burial of hydrophobic residues along the histone chains of eukarya, archaea and a transcription factor.BMC structural biology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The eukaryotic histone dimers, H3-H4 and H2A-H2B, are formed in the cytosol prior to being transported into the nucleus and assembled into the nucleosome. Residue side-chain distances from the interior of the histone dimers are obtained with an ellipsoidal spatial metric and structural information provided by X-ray analyses at atomic resolution of the nucleosome core particles. While the spatial hydrophobic moment profiles of the dimers are comparable with profiles obtained previously that characterize the hydrophobic core of single-chain, single-domain globular soluble proteins, correlation coefficients between the side-chain hydrophobicities and distances from the interior of the H3-H4 dimer and H2A-H2B dimer differ significantly. This difference is traced to the H3 histone fold, which segregates fewer hydrophobic residues within the protein interior than the three other folds. Examination of the correlation coefficient between residue hydrophobicity and side-chain distance from the dimer interior over local regions of the fold sequence shows that the region of reduced correlation is associated mainly with the residues at the carboxyl end of the H3 histone fold, the helical region of the fold involved in the H3-H3' binding of the (H3-H4)(2) tetramer of the nucleosome. Hydrophobic interactions apparently contribute to the binding of this fourfold helical bundle and this evolutionary requirement may trade off against the requirement for H3-H4 dimer stability. The present results provide a different view than previously proposed, albeit of similar origin, to account for the reduced stability of the H3-H4 dimer compared with the H2A-H2B dimer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15871046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.