ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2005
Structure, expression, and transcriptional regulation of the Strongylocentrotus franciscanus spec gene family encoding intracellular calcium-binding proteins.
Article in Development genes and evolution, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intragenomic evolution of a transcriptional enhancer in the genome of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.Marine genomics · 2009Article
- SpGataE, a Strongylocentrotus purpuratus ortholog of mammalian Gata4/5/6: protein expression, interaction with putative target gene spec2a, and identification of friend of Gata factor SpFog1.Development genes and evolution · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanisms by which gene expression patterns emerge during evolution are poorly understood. The sea urchin spec genes offer a useful means to investigate evolutionary mechanisms. Genes of the spec family from Strongylocentrotus purpuratus and Lytechinus pictus have identical patterns of aboral ectoderm-specific expression but exhibit species-specific differences in copy number, genomic structure, temporal expression, and cis-regulatory architecture. Here, we identify spec genes from a phylogenetic intermediate, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus, to gain insight into the evolution of the spec gene family and its transcriptional regulation. We identified two spec genes in the S. franciscanus genome, sfspec1a and sfspec1b, that were orthologous to spec1 from S. purpuratus. sfspec1b transcripts began to accumulate at the blastula stage and became progressively more abundant; this was reminiscent of spec expression in L. pictus but different from that in S. purpuratus. As expected, sfspec1b expression was restricted to aboral ectoderm cells. The six-exon structure of the sfspec1b genomic locus was identical to that of the S. purpuratus spec genes and was bounded by two repeat-spacer-repeat (RSR) repetitive sequence elements, which are conserved features of S. purpuratus spec genes and function as transcriptional enhancers. The enhancer activity of the sfspec1b RSRs was comparable to that of their S. purpuratus counterparts, although the placement and orientation of crucial cis-regulatory elements within the RSRs differed. We discovered a spec gene in S. franciscanus that was only distantly related to other spec genes but was highly conserved in S. purpuratus. Unexpectedly, this gene was expressed exclusively in endoderm lineages. Our results show that the evolution of spec cis-regulatory elements is highly dynamic and that substantial alterations can occur when maintaining or grossly modifying gene expression patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.