Trial reportJAMA2005
Acupuncture for patients with migraine: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 212 papers, 30 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Trial of Treating Migraine With Acupuncture
Comparison of the Prophylactic Effect Between Acupuncture and Acupressure on Menstrual Migraine
A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Personalized Acupuncture, Fixed Acupuncture, Letrozole and Placebo on Live Birth for Infertility in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Who cites it
212 citing papers in PubMed, 30 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 646 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of Acupuncture Therapy for Adult Chronic Daily Headache Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of neuromodulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Pooled it
- Acupuncture improves migraine and quality of life in patients with migraine: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Does the outcome of acupuncture differ according to the location of sham needling points in acupuncture trials for migraine? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The 200 most influential publications in migraine research: a bibliometric mapping of the intellectual landscape.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- The use of acupuncture for addressing neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with long COVID: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- The durable effect of acupuncture for episodic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of acupuncture-related therapy for migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a trial sequential meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Do the effects of acupuncture vary between acupuncturists? Analysis of the Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration individual patient data meta-analysis.Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society · 2021Pooled it
- Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects.Trials · 2021Pooled it
- Acupuncture versus propranolol in migraine prophylaxis: an indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2020Pooled it
- Acupuncture for Chronic Pain: Update of an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.The journal of pain · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Acupuncture and moxibustion for chronic fatigue syndrome in traditional Chinese medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Acupuncture for the prevention of episodic migraine.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Sham Acupressure Controls Used in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Critique.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Bias due to lack of patient blinding in clinical trials. A systematic review of trials randomizing patients to blind and nonblind sub-studies.International journal of epidemiology · 2014Pooled it
- Effectiveness of acupuncture to treat irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
152 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextAcupuncture is widely used to prevent migraine attacks, but the available evidence of its benefit is scarce.
objectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture and with no acupuncture in patients with migraine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Three-group, randomized, controlled trial (April 2002-January 2003) involving 302 patients (88% women), mean (SD) age of 43 (11) years, with migraine headaches, based on International Headache Society criteria. Patients were treated at 18 outpatient centers in Germany.
interventionsAcupuncture, sham acupuncture, or waiting list control. Acupuncture and sham acupuncture were administered by specialized physicians and consisted of 12 sessions per patient over 8 weeks. Patients completed headache diaries from 4 weeks before to 12 weeks after randomization and from week 21 to 24 after randomization.
main outcome measuresDifference in headache days of moderate or severe intensity between the 4 weeks before and weeks 9 to 12 after randomization.
resultsBetween baseline and weeks 9 to 12, the mean (SD) number of days with headache of moderate or severe intensity decreased by 2.2 (2.7) days from a baseline of 5.2 (2.5) days in the acupuncture group compared with a decrease to 2.2 (2.7) days from a baseline of 5.0 (2.4) days in the sham acupuncture group, and by 0.8 (2.0) days from a baseline if 5.4 (3.0) days in the waiting list group. No difference was detected between the acupuncture and the sham acupuncture groups (0.0 days, 95% confidence interval, -0.7 to 0.7 days; P = .96) while there was a difference between the acupuncture group compared with the waiting list group (1.4 days; 95% confidence interval; 0.8-2.1 days; P<.001). The proportion of responders (reduction in headache days by at least 50%) was 51% in the acupuncture group, 53% in the sham acupuncture group, and 15% in the waiting list group.
conclusionAcupuncture was no more effective than sham acupuncture in reducing migraine headaches although both interventions were more effective than a waiting list control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.