ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2005
[Current insights into the development of new glucocorticoid receptor ligands].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent insights into the mechanisms of genomic and non-genomic glucocorticoid actions have stimulated the search for novel glucocorticoid receptor ligands. These efforts are driven by the need to improve the benefit-risk ratio of these important drugs. Glucocorticoids are very frequently and successfully used drugs which mediate important immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects, but unfortunately they have pleiotropic effects causing a number of adverse reactions which limit their clinical use, especially at higher dosages and for longer periods. For this reason, novel glucocorticoid receptor ligands are being developed, among them selective glucocorticoid receptor agonists (SEGRAs). SEGRAs are drugs that predominantly induce transrepression effects (inhibition of protein synthesis), whereas the transactivation activity (induction of protein synthesis) is significantly reduced as compared with conventional glucocorticoid drugs. This makes sense since it became evident over the last few years that many adverse effects are predominantly caused by the transactivation mechanism, whereas anti-inflammatory effects are mostly mediated by transrepression mechanisms. Other interesting examples for exciting new developments are NO-glucocorticoids and long-circulating liposomal glucocorticoids. It is, however, true of all these developments that further in vivo and in vitro investigations and clinical trials will have to define in more detail their safety-efficacy profile in order to answer the questions whether these drugs as "improved glucocorticoids" will enter clinical medicine in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.