Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15868204›Full record

ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2005

Alternative splicing removes an Ets interaction domain from Lozenge during Drosophila eye development.

Kristina Jackson Behan, Jason Fair, Shalini Singh, Michael Bogwitz, Trent Perry, Vladimir Grubor, Fiona Cunningham, Charles D Nichols, Tara L Cheung, Philip Batterham and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Development genes and evolution, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Receptor tyrosine kinases in Drosophila development.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is Runx a linchpin for developmental signaling in metazoans?Journal of cellular biochemistry · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristina Jackson BehanUniversity of West Florida, Pensacola 32514, USA.
Jason Fair
Shalini Singh
Michael Bogwitz
Trent Perry
Vladimir Grubor
Fiona Cunningham
Charles D Nichols
Tara L Cheung
Philip Batterham
John Archie Pollock
University of Melbourne · AUDuquesne University · USLouisiana State University · USUniversity of West Florida · US

Funding

MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENE EXPRESSION IN THE RETINAR55EY009093 · NEI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI POLLOCK, JOHN ARCHIE · 1992 to 1992
–
NEI NIH HHS EY09093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical and functional characteristics of the RUNX family of transcription factors are conserved between vertebrates and the Drosophila protein Lozenge. The runt-homology domain responsible for DNA binding and also the C-terminus are both nearly identical between the two proteins. The mammalian and fly proteins heterodimerize with a non-DNA binding partner protein to form a core binding factor essential for gene regulation during cell differentiation. The mammalian protein RUNX1 (AML1/PEBP2alphaB) interacts with the transcription factor Ets-1 to increase DNA binding and transactivation potential. Alternative splicing of the mammalian RUNX1 removes a domain required for this cooperative transactivation. In this work we determine the structure of the lozenge transcription unit and map 21 mutations. We show that the lozenge transcript is alternatively spliced during eye development to remove an Ets interaction domain. Emphasis is placed on Pointed the Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate Ets-1 protein; both Lozenge and Pointed proteins are needed for the activation of prospero expression. We use site-directed mutagenesis and yeast two-hybrid analysis to show that conserved amino acids within the alternate Lozenge exon are important for interaction with Pointed. Furthermore, the ectopic expression of Lozenge is sufficient to rescue Prospero expression in the presence of the Pointed competitor, Yan(ACT). We show that both lozenge isoforms are expressed during eye development and that the relative ratio of the transcripts for the two isoforms is sensitive to changes in Ras activity. We suggest that during eye development, Lozenge isoforms function in divergent roles, either interacting with Pointed on downstream targets or by functioning independently to establish distinct cell fates.

Indexed as

Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-etsAlternative SplicingAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBinding SitesCells, CulturedDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEyeModels, BiologicalMolecular Sequence DataMutationNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProtein BindingDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinslz protein, DrosophilaNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear Proteinspnt protein, Drosophilapros protein, DrosophilaProtein IsoformsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-etsras ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15868204
OpenAlexW2018494173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.