ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2005
Alternative splicing removes an Ets interaction domain from Lozenge during Drosophila eye development.
Article in Development genes and evolution, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Drosophila ETV5 Homologue Ets96B: Molecular Link between Obesity and Bipolar Disorder.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Receptor tyrosine kinases in Drosophila development.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013Review
- Notch cooperates with Lozenge/Runx to lock haemocytes into a differentiation programme.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2013Article
- The lens in focus: a comparison of lens development in Drosophila and vertebrates.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2011Review
- Rapid evolutionary rewiring of a structurally constrained eye enhancer.Current biology : CB · 2011Article
- The consequences of regulation of desat1 expression for pheromone emission and detection in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2010Article
- Canal cristae growth and fiber extension to the outer hair cells of the mouse ear require Prox1 activity.PloS one · 2010Article
- Ttk69-dependent repression of lozenge prevents the ectopic development of R7 cells in the Drosophila larval eye disc.BMC developmental biology · 2009Article
- Is Runx a linchpin for developmental signaling in metazoans?Journal of cellular biochemistry · 2009Article
- Alternative splicing of transcription factors' genes: beyond the increase of proteome diversity.Comparative and functional genomics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Physical and functional characteristics of the RUNX family of transcription factors are conserved between vertebrates and the Drosophila protein Lozenge. The runt-homology domain responsible for DNA binding and also the C-terminus are both nearly identical between the two proteins. The mammalian and fly proteins heterodimerize with a non-DNA binding partner protein to form a core binding factor essential for gene regulation during cell differentiation. The mammalian protein RUNX1 (AML1/PEBP2alphaB) interacts with the transcription factor Ets-1 to increase DNA binding and transactivation potential. Alternative splicing of the mammalian RUNX1 removes a domain required for this cooperative transactivation. In this work we determine the structure of the lozenge transcription unit and map 21 mutations. We show that the lozenge transcript is alternatively spliced during eye development to remove an Ets interaction domain. Emphasis is placed on Pointed the Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate Ets-1 protein; both Lozenge and Pointed proteins are needed for the activation of prospero expression. We use site-directed mutagenesis and yeast two-hybrid analysis to show that conserved amino acids within the alternate Lozenge exon are important for interaction with Pointed. Furthermore, the ectopic expression of Lozenge is sufficient to rescue Prospero expression in the presence of the Pointed competitor, Yan(ACT). We show that both lozenge isoforms are expressed during eye development and that the relative ratio of the transcripts for the two isoforms is sensitive to changes in Ras activity. We suggest that during eye development, Lozenge isoforms function in divergent roles, either interacting with Pointed on downstream targets or by functioning independently to establish distinct cell fates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.