ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2005
Public health and economic consequences of methyl mercury toxicity to the developing brain.
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global methylmercury exposure from seafood consumption and risk of developmental neurotoxicity: a systematic review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2014Pooled it
- A systematic review of US state environmental legislation and regulation with regards to the prevention of neurodevelopmental disabilities and asthma.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2009Pooled it
- Mitochondrial dysfunction mediates the association between mercury exposure and lipid metabolism in children and adolescents.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Article
- Burden of Disease Attributed to Prenatal Methylmercury Exposure in the Yanomami Indigenous Land.Toxics · 2025Article
- Acute toxicity of mercury in response to metallothionein expression and oxidative and cellular metabolic stress in Barbonymus gonionotus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of the anthropogenic effect onPeerJ · 2025Article
- Review
- What does scientometry tell us about mercury toxicology and its biological impairments?Heliyon · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Flexible Nanocomposite Conductors for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding.Nano-micro letters · 2023Review
- The Pediatrician's Role in Protecting Children from Environmental Hazards.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2023Review
- Dose-response relationship between multiple trace elements and risk of all-cause mortality: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Impact of Heavy Metal Toxicity on the Gut Microbiota and Its Relationship with Metabolites and Future Probiotics Strategy: a Review.Biological trace element research · 2022Review
- Demystifying mercury geochemistry in contaminated soil-groundwater systems with complementary mercury stable isotope, concentration, and speciation analyses.Environmental science. Processes & impacts · 2022Article
- Potential Application of Living Microorganisms in the Detoxification of Heavy Metals.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Demethylation-The Other Side of the Mercury Methylation Coin: A Critical Review.ACS environmental Au · 2022Review
- Concentration and speciation of mercury in atmospheric particulates in the Wuda coal fire area, Inner Mongolia, China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Article
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methyl mercury is a developmental neurotoxicant. Exposure results principally from consumption by pregnant women of seafood contaminated by mercury from anthropogenic (70%) and natural (30%) sources. Throughout the 1990s, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) made steady progress in reducing mercury emissions from anthropogenic sources, especially from power plants, which account for 41% of anthropogenic emissions. However, the U.S. EPA recently proposed to slow this progress, citing high costs of pollution abatement. To put into perspective the costs of controlling emissions from American power plants, we have estimated the economic costs of methyl mercury toxicity attributable to mercury from these plants. We used an environmentally attributable fraction model and limited our analysis to the neurodevelopmental impacts--specifically loss of intelligence. Using national blood mercury prevalence data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we found that between 316,588 and 637,233 children each year have cord blood mercury levels > 5.8 microg/L, a level associated with loss of IQ. The resulting loss of intelligence causes diminished economic productivity that persists over the entire lifetime of these children. This lost productivity is the major cost of methyl mercury toxicity, and it amounts to $8.7 billion annually (range, $2.2-43.8 billion; all costs are in 2000 US$). Of this total, $1.3 billion (range, $0.1-6.5 billion) each year is attributable to mercury emissions from American power plants. This significant toll threatens the economic health and security of the United States and should be considered in the debate on mercury pollution controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.