Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15864586›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2005

Increase in autoantibodies against Fas (CD95) during carcinogenesis in the human colon: a hope for the immunoprevention of cancer?

B M Reipert, S Tanneberger, A Pannetta, M Bedosti, M Poell, K Zimmermann, M T Stellamor

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Do antiphospholipid antibodies develop for a purpose?Current rheumatology reports · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

B M ReipertBiomolecular Therapeutics (BMT)-Research Center, Industriestrasse 72, 1220 Vienna, Austria. birgit_reipert@baxter.com
S Tanneberger
A Pannetta
M Bedosti
M Poell
K Zimmermann
M T Stellamor
Baxter (Austria) · ATAzienda USL di Bologna · ITANT Foundation Italy Onlus · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A thorough understanding of the naturally occurring events in the immune system in response to carcinogenesis will facilitate the development of strategies for the immunoprevention of cancer. The adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the human colon is a well-established clinical example of multi-step carcinogenesis and can be used for immunological studies. Based on previous observations that both apoptosis and the expression of Fas (Apo-1, CD95) are altered during carcinogenesis in the human colon, we asked the question whether serum titers of autoantibodies against Fas show any modification during the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Healthy controls (38), patients with colorectal adenomas (38) and patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas (21) were investigated. Anti-Fas antibody titers were found to be significantly higher in patients with colorectal adenomas than in healthy controls and higher still in patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas. This increase in anti-Fas autoantibody titers during carcinogenesis might reflect the activation of natural defense mechanisms by the immune system.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenomaAgedAutoantibodiesCase-Control StudiesColonColorectal NeoplasmsFas Ligand Proteinfas ReceptorFemaleHumansMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedRectumUp-RegulationAutoantibodiesFASLG protein, humanFas Ligand Proteinfas ReceptorMembrane Glycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID15864586
PMCPMC11032757
OpenAlexW2016033678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.