Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15864508›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2005

[Guidelines of lipid therapy translation into clinical practice].

M Rosenberg, M Haass

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M RosenbergMedizinische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg.
M Haass

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in lipid metabolism play a major role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and are an important risk factor for cardiovascular events. Lowering of LDL cholesterol by statins reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), both in primary and secondary prevention. The results of large controlled trials that included more than 50,000 patients are the basis for target values promoted by current guidelines. According to the NCEP-ATP III guidelines LDL cholesterol should be lowered to less than 100 mg/dl in high risk patients (CAD or CAD equivalent) and in very high risk patients optional to less than 70 mg/dl. Up to now even in high risk patients the recommended goals are not sufficiently achieved: Up to 80% of high risk patients do not receive a statin and only a minority of those being treated with a statin have a LDL cholesterol below 100 mg/dl. Furthermore, after a major event (e.g. myocardial infarction) the quality of lipid reduction decreases over time. Further efforts are required to improve this situation as a guide-line oriented approach may help to prevent up to 100,000 myocardial infarctions and deaths alone in high risk patients in Germany.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicCoronary Artery DiseaseGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansHyperlipidemiasHypolipidemic AgentsMyocardial InfarctionPractice Patterns, Physicians'Treatment OutcomeHypolipidemic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.