Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15861199›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2005

Amniotic fluid: not just fetal urine anymore.

Mark A Underwood, William M Gilbert, Michael P Sherman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04886960 (A Phase I/II Randomized Double-Blinded Standard of Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 271 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
271citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04886960 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I/II Randomized Double-Blinded Standard of Care (Corticosteroid) vs. Sterile Amniotic Fluid for Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2021 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsOsteo Arthritis KneeArmsAmniotic Fluid Injection, Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

271 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Evaluation of Fetal Exposures to Metals and Metalloids through Meconium Analyses: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction at birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by early twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser surgery.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

211 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark A UnderwoodDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
William M Gilbert
Michael P Sherman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amniotic fluid (AF) is a complex substance essential to fetal well-being. This article reviews recent discoveries and the current understanding of the origin and circulation of AF and its nutritive, protective, and diagnostic functions. Future directions for AF research are also discussed.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAmniotic FluidFemaleFetal DiseasesGestational AgeHumansOligohydramniosPolyhydramniosPregnancyResearch DesignRisk AssessmentSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID15861199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.