Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15861197›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2005

Dedicated neonatal retrieval teams improve delivery room resuscitation of outborn premature infants.

P J McNamara, W Mak, H E Whyte

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Ethical considerations in quality improvement.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Maximum vasoactive-inotropic score and mortality in extremely premature, extremely low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Observational
  8. Do transport factors increase the risk of severe brain injury in outborn infants <33 weeks gestational age?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neonatal Transport Network Services: Preparedness of healthcare systems in Southern Nigeria.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P J McNamaraAcute Care Transport Services, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
W Mak
H E Whyte
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorbidity related to ineffective resuscitation and stabilization of premature infants is increased when delivery occurs outside tertiary perinatal centers. The regional neonatal transport team received extensive training to expand their scope of practice to include delivery room resuscitation allowing them to attend high-risk deliveries in community hospitals when maternal transfer was not possible.

objectiveCompare the resuscitation and stabilization of premature infants when a specialized neonatal retrieval team (SNRT) is in attendance at delivery with immediate resuscitation and stabilization performed by the referral hospital team (RHT). STUDY

designWe assessed the impact of a specially trained neonatal transport team by comparing the initial resuscitation process, airway and vascular access skills, illness severity and patient stabilization in both groups.

resultsNeonates resuscitated by the RHT were more likely to receive oxygen, mask CPAP, bag and mask ventilation and cardiac compressions for a significantly longer time period. Neonates resuscitated by the SNRT were intubated more promptly (8.5 minutes {1 to 22} vs 16 minutes {1 to 90}, p=0.035) following a fewer number of attempts. The endotracheal tube was correctly positioned on radiological assessment in 72% of cases in the SNRT group vs 38.1% in the RHT group (p<0.001). Many neonates had no vascular access (31%) and were profoundly hypothermic (38.5%) on arrival of the SNRT. Although there was no significant difference in maximum FiO(2) or oxygenation index, babies with respiratory distress syndrome resuscitated by the RHT were less likely to receive surfactant therapy (76.6 vs 34.4%, p=0.001). There was no difference in transport-related mortality between the groups

conclusionsThe presence of a highly skilled transport team at a high-risk preterm delivery improves the quality of neonatal resuscitation by increasing intubation success rates and achieving earlier vascular access. Neonates resuscitated by dedicated neonatal retrieval teams were less likely to become significantly hypothermic. Although the severity of RDS was similar neonates in the RHT were less likely to receive surfactant.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInfant, PrematureAnalysis of VarianceDelivery RoomsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMaternal AgeNeonatal NursingNeonatologyOntarioPatient Care TeamPregnancyProbability

Identifiers

PMID15861197
OpenAlexW2036754166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.