Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15861172›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2005

Overview of surfactant replacement trials.

Gautham K Suresh, Roger F Soll

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. RDS-NExT workshop: consensus statements for the use of surfactant in preterm neonates with RDS.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Update of minimally invasive surfactant therapy.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gautham K SureshMedical University of South Carolina Children's Hospital, Charleston, USA.
Roger F Soll
Medical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials have evaluated the overall efficacy of surfactant therapy, as well as the relative efficacy of different surfactant preparations, the optimal timing of administration and the optimal dosage. Surfactant therapy leads to significant clinical improvement in infants at risk for, or having, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Clinical trials that compared the effects of synthetic or animal-derived surfactant preparations to placebo or no therapy demonstrate that surfactant therapy lead to rapid improvement in oxygenation, decreased ventilator support, decreased risk of pneumothorax, and mortality. Earlier treatment, prophylactic treatment of infants at high risk of developing RDS, and selective re-treatment leads to improved clinical outcome as well. Currently available animal-derived surfactants are superior to non-protein-containing synthetic surfactants. Ongoing evaluation will determine if important differences in animal-derived products are noted. Future trials will evaluate third-generation surfactant products and further refine what constitutes optimal use of surfactant.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDrug Administration ScheduleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematurePulmonary SurfactantsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornRetreatmentPulmonary Surfactants

Identifiers

PMID15861172
OpenAlexW2085183303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.