ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2005
A survey and audit of the first 'Guides to Local Health Services' produced by Primary Care Trusts in England.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProviding more information for the public about the range and quality of health services is an important part of improving accountability, quality and public responsiveness. Most sources of information to date have failed to address the information needs of people about their local services. The launch in England in 2002 of a new publication, Guides to Local Health Services, was designed to address this deficiency. We conducted an audit of the first Guides, and surveyed those responsible for their production, in order to examine the Guides' development, content, presentation and dissemination, and to critique the purpose of the initiative.
methodsA semi-structured questionnaire survey of those responsible for producing the Guides, and an audit of the Guides produced by Primary Care Trusts (PCTs).
resultsMost PCTs complied with central guidance about structure and content, but in meeting multiple requirements the Guides lost their clarity of purpose. The content was dominated by information relating to financial and strategic accountability. In producing the Guides, external consultation was limited, particularly with the public but also with local partnership providers of health and social care. The main issues were the lack of a clear focus for Guide information, the level of central direction, the short production lead times, difficulties with distribution, and the many competing demands being made on PCT resources.
conclusionsGuide content should be clearly focused on information that the public wants. Greater responsibility should be devolved to front line PCT staff to determine content in consultation with local users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.