Shared decision-making: the debate continues.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Patient factors driving overuse of cardiac catheterisation: a qualitative study with 25 participants from two German teaching practices.BMJ open · 2019
   Article
2. Older patients' participation in hospital admissions through the emergency department: an interview study of healthcare professionals.BMC health services research · 2015
   Article
3. Birth control: to what extent do women report being informed and involved in decisions about pregnancy and birth procedures?BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2014
   Article
4. Questioning context: a set of interdisciplinary questions for investigating contextual factors affecting health decision making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
   Article
5. [Patient involvement in decision making in primary care clinics: development of a measuring tool].Atencion primaria · 2010
   Article
6. Inside the black box of shared decision making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2006
   Article
7. Predicting preferences: a neglected aspect of shared decision-making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2006
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as