SynthesisJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2005
The role of calcium antagonists in stroke prevention.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- 7th Brazilian Guideline of Arterial Hypertension: Chapter 7 - Pharmacological TreatmentArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2016Guideline
- Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009Pooled it
- Effect of Amlodipine in Stroke and Myocardial infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Cardiology and therapy · 2021Review
- Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lowering elevated blood pressure significantly reduces the risk of stroke, but whether any specific type of antihypertensive medication is better for this purpose, independent of blood pressure-lowering effects, is controversial. Compared with placebo or no treatment, the point estimate for stroke reduction is the largest with calcium antagonists; all such studies used dihydropyridine compounds. When all clinical trials published through December 2004 are combined in meta-analysis, stroke is not significantly reduced when an initial dihydropyridine or nondihydropyridine calcium antagonist is compared with an initial diuretic or beta blocker, but when the two subclasses are combined, stroke reduction (9%) is significant. The risk of heart failure, however, is significantly increased (by 29%) with the initial calcium antagonist. These estimates may change as newer trials are reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.